2009 BCS Standings

(December 6, 2009)


Harris Interactive
USA Today
Computers
Rank Team BCS Avg. Prev. Rank Pts. % Rank Pts. % Avg. Rank Pts. %
1. Alabama (13-0) .9978 2 1 2841 .9968 1 1470 .9966 1 100 1.000
2. Texas (13-0) .9433 3 2 2721 .9547 2 1409 .9553 3 92 .920
3. Cincinnati (12-0) .8878 5 4 2467 .8656 4 1280 .8678 2 93 .930
4. TCU (12-0) .8836 4 3 2579 .9049 3 1336 .9058 5 84 .840
5. Florida (12-1) .8637 1 5 2395 .8404 5 1240 .8407 4 91 .910
6. Boise State (13-0) .8106 6 6 2358 .8274 6 1216 .8244 6 78 .780
7. Oregon (10-2) .7568 7 7 2130 .7474 7 1096 .7431 6 78 .780
8. Ohio State (10-2) .6568 8 8 2081 .7302 8 1077 .7302 12 51 .510
9. Georgia Tech (11-2) .6471 10 10 1787 .6270 10 921 .6244 8 69 .690
10. Iowa (10-2) .6180 9 11 1772 .6218 11 918 .6224 10 61 .610
11. Virginia Tech (9-3) .5675 12 12 1569 .5505 12 829 .5620 11 59 .590
12. LSU (9-3) .5375 13 13 1384 .4856 13 718 .4868 9 64 .640
13. Penn State (10-2) .5319 11 9 1800 .6316 9 950 .6441 18 32 .320
14. BYU (10-2) .4531 14 14 1349 .4733 14 702 .4759 15 41 .410
15. Miami (Fla.) (9-3) .4419 17 15 1173 .4116 15 611 .4142 13 50 .500
16. West Virginia (9-3) .3357 23 18 730 .2561 17 429 .2908 14 46 .460
17. Pittsburgh (9-3) .3141 15 16 995 .3491 16 506 .3431 20 25 .250
18. Oregon State (8-4) .2876 16 19 722 .2533 20 368 .2495 17 36 .360
19. Oklahoma State (9-3) .2628 20 17 839 .2944 18 404 .2739 21 22 .220
20. Arizona (8-4) .2248 NR 24 381 .1337 23 237 .1607 16 38 .380
21. Stanford (8-4) .1803 24 21 625 .2193 21 253 .1715 22 15 .150
22. Nebraska (9-4) .1655 22 20 631 .2214 19 391 .2651 30 1 .010
23. Utah (9-3) .1245 25 22 511 .1793 24 183 .1241 24 7 .070
24. Southern California (8-4) .1207 18 26 124 .0435 27 42 .0285 19 29 .290
25. Wisconsin (9-3) .1203 NR 23 409 .1435 22 247 .1675 26 5 .050

 

POLL EXPLANATION & ABOUT THE BCS:

The Harris Interactive Poll, USA Today Coaches Poll and computer rankings each comprise one-third of the BCS Standings. To derive the three percentages, each team is assigned an inverse point total (25 for No. 1, 24 for No. 2, etc.) The two poll percentages are calculated by dividing each team’s point total by a maximum 2850 possible points (Harris) and 1475 possible points (USA Today). The computer rankings percentage is calculated by dropping the highest and lowest ranking for each team and then dividing the remaining total by 100 (the maximum possible points). The BCS Average is calculated by averaging the percentage totals of the Harris Interactive Poll, USA Today Poll, and computer rankings. The teams’ BCS Averages are ranked to produce the BCS Standings. The six computer ranking providers are Anderson & Hester, Richard Billingsley, Colley Matrix, Kenneth Massey, Jeff Sagarin and Peter Wolfe. Each computer ranking provider accounts for schedule strength within its formula.

The BCS is a five-game arrangement for post-season college football that is managed by the 11 Football Bowl Subdivision (formerly Division I-A) conferences and institutions. Its purpose is to match the top two teams in a bowl game and to create exciting matchups in four other games.

The No. 1 and No. 2 teams in the Dec. 6 BCS standings will play in the Citi BCS National Championship on Jan. 7, 2010 in Pasadena, Calif. The winner of the game will be presented the Coaches Trophy, emblematic of the national championship. For more information, visit www.bcsfootball.org.

 



Copyright © 2013 by NCAA Football   All rights reserved.
NCAA is a registered trademark of the National Collegiate Athletic Association and the NCAA Football logo is a registered trademark of the NCAA licensed to NCAA Football USA, Inc.
Powered By: